LinguaGnosis™ Beta Tester Feedback Form

Thank you for testing LinguaGnosis™. This form captures your findings so we can improve the tool. Please complete all 5 pages, then click Submit Feedback at the top or bottom of the form. Your responses will be sent directly to the LG Consultants team.

How to Complete Your Beta Test

STEP 1

Upload a document — Use the Upload Panel (see Diagram 1 below). Drag & drop your .docx, .pdf, or .txt file into the blue upload zone, or click the button to browse.

STEP 2

Review the Flagged Segments — LinguaGnosis™ will analyze the MT output and display flagged segments in a table (see Diagram 2). Each row shows the source, the MT output, the error type, and severity.

STEP 3

Check the QA Score — The QA Score Panel (see Diagram 3) shows your document's overall score out of 100, broken down by error count and severity. Compare this against your own manual review.

STEP 4

Fill out this form — Record every error you found manually AND whether LinguaGnosis™ caught it. Use the Error Category Tracking table on Page 4 to log findings by error type. Totals calculate automatically.

STEP 5

Submit your form — Click the Submit Feedback button at the top or bottom of this page. Your responses are sent instantly to the LG Consultants team — no email or PDF needed. You'll see a confirmation message when your submission is received.

Interface Diagrams — What to Look For

Diagram 1 — Upload Panel

lgconsultants.co/review

↑

Drag & Drop Your Document

.docx · .pdf · .txt

Diagram 2 — Flagged Segments

Seg#	Error Type	Severity
01	Mistranslation	CRITICAL
02	Terminology	MAJOR
03	Fluency	MINOR
04	Format	MINOR

4 segments flagged · Click to review details

Diagram 3 — QA Score

72

/100

QA SCORE

3 Critical 8 Major 15 Minor

What the callouts mean:

1

Diagram 1: The blue zone is where you upload your file. Accepted formats: .docx, .pdf, .txt

2

Diagram 2: Each row = one flagged segment. Red=Critical, Amber=Major, Teal=Minor. Compare these to your own findings.

3

Diagram 3: The QA Score (0–100) reflects document quality. Critical errors deduct the most points. Note the error counts by severity.

* Required fields are marked with an asterisk. Fields shaded in teal are auto-calculated — do not edit them manually.

Personal Information

Full Name *

Email Address *

Date of Test *

Primary Language Pair *

Additional Pairs

Professional Background

Years as a Professional Translator * Experience with Machine Translation Review *

None — first time reviewing MT output Some — I've done MT review occasionally Extensive — MT review is part of my regular work

Have you used other MT Quality Assurance tools before? *

Yes No — LinguaGnosis™ is my first

Specialization

Legal/Immigration Translation Experience

Yes — I regularly translate legal/immigration documents Some — occasionally No — I work in other domains

Primary Domain(s) of Expertise

Any other context you want us to know about you?

Document Details

Source Language *

Target Language *

Approximate Word Count *

Number of Segments

Document Type *

If "Other", describe:

Machine Translation Engine Used

If "Other", specify engine:

Time Comparison

How long did your review take? This helps us measure the time-saving impact of LinguaGnosis™. "Estimated Time Saved" is calculated automatically.

Column	Enter Minutes
Manual Review Only How long it would have taken without LinguaGnosis™
With LinguaGnosis™ Actual time taken during your beta test session
Estimated Time Saved ✦ Auto Manual Review − With LinguaGnosis™

Document-Level Notes

Describe the document briefly (subject matter, complexity, any unusual content):

Were there domain-specific terms that LinguaGnosis™ handled well or poorly?

Did the document contain any content that confused the tool (tables, numbers, proper nouns)?

How to Use This Table

You Found — Count every error of this type you identified in your own manual review
Tool Flagged — How many did LinguaGnosis™ flag in that category?
Missed by Tool — Auto-calculated: Your Found − Tool Flagged
False Pos. — How many did the tool flag that were NOT actually errors?
Severity — Click the highest severity level seen for that error category
All Totals row values are auto-calculated from the column sums above

Error Category	Subcategory	You Found	Tool Flagged	Missed by Tool	False Pos.	Severity (C / M / m)	Notes
ACCURACY
Mistranslation (wrong meaning)					PLACEHOLDER_acc_mt
Omission (content missing)					PLACEHOLDER_acc_om
Addition (content added)					PLACEHOLDER_acc_ad
Untranslated (source left in)					PLACEHOLDER_acc_un
FLUENCY
Grammar Error					PLACEHOLDER_fl_gr
Spelling / Punct.					PLACEHOLDER_fl_sp
Unnatural Phrasing					PLACEHOLDER_fl_ph
TERMINOLOGY
Wrong Term Used					PLACEHOLDER_te_wt
Inconsistent Term					PLACEHOLDER_te_in
LEGAL / COMPLIANCE
Legal Term Error					PLACEHOLDER_lc_lt
Compliance Risk					PLACEHOLDER_lc_cr
FORMAT
Number / Date Fmt.					PLACEHOLDER_fo_nd
Punct. Convention					PLACEHOLDER_fo_pc
STYLE
Register / Tone					PLACEHOLDER_st_rt
TOTALS — Cumulative across all categories

Severity Guide

C = Critical: Causes serious misunderstanding, legal risk, or compliance failure

M = Major: Affects the meaning of the text but does not create legal risk

m = Minor: Style, fluency, or formatting issue; does not affect overall meaning

Accuracy Ratings (select one per row)

Dimension	1 Poor	2	3	4	5 Excellent
Overall accuracy of LinguaGnosis™ findings
Ease of use and navigation
Clarity of error explanations and labels
Usefulness of the QA Score
Quality of the final review report

Time Efficiency

Compared to reviewing MT output manually, LinguaGnosis™ saved me:

No time — similar effort

Some time (10–25% faster)

Moderate time (25–50% faster)

Significant time (50–75% faster)

Major time savings (75%+ faster)

Would you use LinguaGnosis™ in your professional workflow?

Yes — absolutely, I would use it regularly Maybe — with some improvements No — it does not meet my current needs

Qualitative Feedback

What did LinguaGnosis™ do BEST in your test? *

What errors did it miss most often? What pattern did you notice? *

What was most confusing or frustrating about the interface or results?

If you could add ONE feature, what would it be?

Additional comments, suggestions, or observations:

Tester Confirmation

By signing below, I confirm that the information provided in this form reflects my honest and independent assessment of LinguaGnosis™.

Printed Name

Signature (type your name)

Date

✅

Ready to submit? Click the button to send your feedback instantly.

Questions? Email info@lgconsultants.co | Call 667-217-6543

LinguaGnosis™ Beta Tester Feedback Form

Page 2 — Tester Profile

Page 3 — Document Information

Page 4 — Error Category Tracking

Page 5 — Overall Assessment

Feedback Received — Thank You!